Multinational Finance Journal
© Multinational Finance Society, a non-profit corporation. All rights reserved.
Quarterly publication of the Multinational Finance Society ISSN 1096-1879
Volume 11, Numbers 3 & 4, 2007
Timing Decisions in a Multinational
Context: Implementing the Amin/Bodurtha Framework
(Multinational Finance Journal, 2007, vol. 11, no. 3/4, pp. 157–178)
Manfred Frühwirth
Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Austria
Paul Schneider
Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Austria
Markus S. Schwaiger
Austrian Central Bank and Vienna University of Economics and Business
Administration, Austria
The Amin/Bodurtha framework was developed for the valuation of American-style
financial instruments driven by three sources of uncertainty— domestic interest
rate risk, foreign interest rate risk and exchange rate risk. The model is not
only appropriate for pricing a number of financial derivatives, but also, as we
show, for valuing foreign investment projects in the presence of real options.
In this paper we propose the most natural directly implementable specification
within the Amin/Bodurtha framework that permits all combinations of up and down
moves of these three risk factors without restricting volatility functions of
the factors or correlations between them. By use of the depth-first algorithm,
we can show that this specification is implementable at reasonable computation
times (JEL: G13, G31, F30).
Keywords: American-style derivatives, multinational timing decisions,
depth-first algorithm.
Click here to download the full article (pdf
version)
Asymmetric Return and Volatility
Responses to Composite News from Stock Markets
(Multinational Finance Journal, 2007, vol. 11, no. 3/4, pp. 179–210)
Thomas C. Chiang
Drexel University, U.S.A.
Cathy W.S. Chen
Feng Chia University, Taiwan
Mike K.P. So
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, China
This paper examines the hypothesis that both stock returns and volatility are
asymmetric functions of past information derived from domestic and U.S.
stock-market news. The results show the presence of negative autocorrelation,
which is consistent with the dominance of positive-feedback trading behavior. By
employing a double-threshold autoregressive GARCH model to investigate four
major index-return series, the study finds significant evidence to sustain the
asymmetric hypothesis of stock returns. Specifically, this paper finds that
negative news will cause a decline in national stock returns that is larger than
the gain caused by good news of an equivalent magnitude. This also holds true
for the conditional variance. The return appears to be more volatile and
persistent when bad news hits the market than when good news does (JEL: C15,
C22, G12).
Keywords: asymmetry, threshold GARCH, volatility, Bayesian estimation,
posterior-odds ratio.
Click here to download the full article (pdf
version)
Ownership-Control Discrepancy and
Firm Value: Evidence from France
(Multinational Finance Journal, 2007, vol. 11, no. 3/4, pp. 211–252)
Sabri Boubaker
Université Paris XII, Val de Marne, France
The purpose of this study is to provide an empirical analysis of the
relationship between ownership structure of French firms and their value. Using
data for 510 French publicly traded firms, the current study provides evidence
in support of the entrenchment hypothesis. The results show that large
controlling shareholders maintaining grip on control while holding only small
fraction of cash flow rights are inclined to expropriate minority shareholders,
which in turn detrimentally affects the firm’s valuation. The evidence also
indicates that pyramiding is the main device set to unduly entrench the large
controlling shareholder. Additional analysis reveals that the identity of the
second largest controlling shareholder matters. Sharing control with a family
constrains the largest controlling shareholder to steer clear of self-serving
behavior. However sharing control with a widely held firm or with a financial
institution fosters this self-serving behavior (JEL: G32, G34).
Keywords: ownership structure, corporate governance, minority
expropriation.
Click here to download the full article (pdf
version)
Swedish Stock Recommendations:
Information Content or Price Pressure?
(Multinational Finance Journal, 2007, vol. 11, no. 3/4, pp. 253–285)
Erik R. Lidén
Göteborg University, Sweden
The paper analyzes stock-price reactions to stock recommendations published in
printed Swedish media and also trading volumes at and around the publication
day, bid/ask spreads, and the post publication drift in recommended stocks for
the period 1995 – 2000. Its small size and limited number of actors makes the
Swedish stock market an interesting comparison to the U.S. stock markets. The
positive publication-day effect for buy recommendations was almost fully
reversed after 20 days, supporting the price pressure hypothesis, and the effect
for sell recommendations was negative and prices continued to drift down,
supporting the information hypothesis. Analysts seem to hand their information
to clients before publication, whereas no such information leaking pattern was
observed for journalists. The impact to recommendations from journalists was
significantly larger than analyst recommendations, implying a tradeoff between
the size of pre-publication cumulative abnormal returns and the publication-day
effect (JEL: G10, G14, G20).
Keywords: price pressure hypothesis, information hypothesis, journalists,
analysts.
Click here to download the full article (pdf
version)
Stationary Component in Stock
Prices: A Reappraisal of Empirical Findings
(Multinational Finance Journal, 2007, vol. 11, no. 3/4, pp. 287–322)
Haitham A. Al-Zoubi
United Arab Emirates University, UAE
Aktham Maghyereh
United Arab Emirates University, UAE
This paper re-examines the issue of mean reversion in stock prices by
incorporating the structural break effect in the long horizon regression. Before
adjusting for structural break, the paper finds that previous studies understate
the evidence of mean-reversion. The understatement is mainly due to the
clustering heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation in the overlapping returns.
After adjusting for structural break(s), no evidence of predictability for
value-weighted returns has been documented. However, stronger evidence of mean
reversion in stock prices is documented for equally-weighted portfolios. The
reverse effect of structural break can be explained by the switch to mean
aversion in the last subperiod of value-weighted portfolios while no such switch
in equally weighted portfolios (JEL: G1, C22).
Keywords: moving blocks bootstrap, mean reversion, structural change,
long-horizon regressions.
Click here to download the full article (pdf
version)